[MD] A PROPOSAL TO ADDRESS "THE POINT"

[Stephen Hannon]

Hello all,

MOQ Wiki:
Perhaps if the MOQ Wiki is open only to MOQ Discuss people, then maybe
we could each have a user page/usertalk page like on Wikipedia (I
happen to be an editor there).  That way we could post disputes on
each other's talk page, and we can use our space to explain our own
views on the MOQ.  Is this possible?

Just a thought,
Steve H

On 10/7/06, David Harding <davidharding at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Hi Ant (and Horse mentioned)
>
> Ant said:
> However, if there is to be an MOQ Wiki which can be developed properly in a
> secure environment, I suggest it is done under the aegis of moq.org (i.e.
> open only to members of MOQ Discuss) with any changes/new entries to be sent
> to and approved by David Harding under the arms length supervision of Horse.
>
> David H:
> Yeah, get Horse in on it too, I dunno what you mean by 'arms length supervision'? What does this mean? I think that the problem with watching the watchers is that no-one watches the people who are watching the watchers. ad infinium.  Might I propose that if he wants to, Horse can join the 'Wiki moderation team'? Or do you have other suggestions Ant? I'm all ears.
>
> Ant said:
> Just another thought as David Harding could have his work cut out with the
> MOQ Wiki., maybe someone else would like to volunteer for that fifth
> editorial place for the Guidebook?
>
> David responds:
> In order to benefit the "mutual positive exchange between the MOQ Wiki and the development of the Guidebook to LILA on MOQ Focus." I'm actually more than happy to do both. But if you, or anyone else wants to pull me off it that's okay too, notwithstanding my right to reply of course.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David.
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>