[MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?

[Case]

I think Ebbinghause saw memory as access to the past much earlier. I am also
taken with Hebb's connectionist model mostly because it fits nicely with the
flowing stream fractal distribution of energy model I like so much.

Case

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of David M
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 2:44 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?

Hi Case

Possibly, certainly not of 'things'.
But memory could also be access to
the past, assuggested by Rupert Sheldrake.

David M


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Case" <Case at iSpots.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?


> [David M]
> I'd say they organise our experience (of practical interaction) and there 
> is
> nothing re-created here.
>
> [Case]
> I think memory is the recreated or recording of experience.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/