[MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?

[Case]

Ebbinghaus did some of the first work on human memory in the late 1800's he
discovered the learning curve and the seldom remembered forgetting curve.
Hebb's work was in neuropsychology. He advanced the theory that as neurons
fire together repeatedly over time, they become associated or: neurons that
get fired together, get wired together. In a sense then learning alters the
structure of the brain.

I confess that I know little about Sheldrake but what I do know in not
promising.

Case

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of David M
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 1:22 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?

Hi Case

Sheldrake was about 1982 I think.
Don't know your guy?

David M
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Case" <Case at iSpots.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?


>I think Ebbinghause saw memory as access to the past much earlier. I am 
>also
> taken with Hebb's connectionist model mostly because it fits nicely with 
> the
> flowing stream fractal distribution of energy model I like so much.
>
> Case
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
> [mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of David M
> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 2:44 PM
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?
>
> Hi Case
>
> Possibly, certainly not of 'things'.
> But memory could also be access to
> the past, assuggested by Rupert Sheldrake.
>
> David M
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Case" <Case at iSpots.com>
> To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 7:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [MD] are theism and mysticism mutually exclusive notions?
>
>
>> [David M]
>> I'd say they organise our experience (of practical interaction) and there
>> is
>> nothing re-created here.
>>
>> [Case]
>> I think memory is the recreated or recording of experience.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> moq_discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/