[MD] Flying Spagetti Monsters

[Micah]

SA,

This is a little tedious. We define what a monkey is, the words "monkey",
"fur", and "opposable thumb" are human terms.

Micah


-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org]On Behalf Of Heather Perella
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:46 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] Flying Spagetti Monsters


MIcah,

     [Micah]
> The question was; is there evidence of animals
> holding concepts independent
> of man?

    Also, humans need monkey's to relate to us about
what a monkey is.  Therefore, we depend on monkey's to
provide us with concepts about what a monkey is.
That's the meat of it, the concept of monkey's is
necessarily human and monkey, since we humans need
monkey to provide us with concepts, yes, to provide us
with concepts, about monkey's.  Now where is that
concept coming from?  It's not wholly human and not
wholly monkey.  Something going on here of quality.

SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/