[MD] Intellect battles the (nude) barbarians

Arlo Bensinger ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu Oct 26 11:03:17 PDT 2006


[Platt]
One does not need to defend an assertion which offers no proof and 
is best characterized as an intellectually barren Rigel-like rant.

[Arlo]
Just another rhetorical dodge. Gene was right on. No coherent defense for 
your ridiculous argument. Just posturing and hot air. I think if there is 
any "intellectually barren Rigel-like rant", it was your post that started 
this thread. And you prove that with every dodge and evasion. So, you going 
to attempt an answer to the questions, or are you going to keep doing the 
Limbaugh Limbo?



More information about the moq_discuss mailing list