[MD] Intellect battles the (nude) barbarians
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu Oct 26 11:03:17 PDT 2006
[Platt]
One does not need to defend an assertion which offers no proof and
is best characterized as an intellectually barren Rigel-like rant.
[Arlo]
Just another rhetorical dodge. Gene was right on. No coherent defense for
your ridiculous argument. Just posturing and hot air. I think if there is
any "intellectually barren Rigel-like rant", it was your post that started
this thread. And you prove that with every dodge and evasion. So, you going
to attempt an answer to the questions, or are you going to keep doing the
Limbaugh Limbo?
More information about the moq_discuss
mailing list