[MD] confused

[gav]

> At 04:30 AM 10/23/2006, Gav wrote:
> >i thought static patterns were abstracted from
> >immediate experience.
> >am i wrong?
> 
> MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net> wrote:

> Hi Gav,
> 
> It seems to me, too.  Do you see a problem with this
> idea?
> 

hey marsha,

i keep thinking of 'nausea' by sartre. 
in it he describes the experience of sitting looking
at a familiar tree in a park. on this particular
occasion he sees something else, not his familiar
tree; it becomes alien, infinite, horrible even; he is
not aware of what it is.

are static patterns conceptual?

i keep thinking of schopenhauer too: the world as will
and idea.

does a static pattern become a static pattern only
when we *recognise* it; or do we experience static
patterns immediately? 

if we experience them immediately (pre-conceptually)
then how does this relate to the 'undifferentiated
aesthetic continuum', which is a synonym for
pre-conceptual 'Quality' reality. doesn't a static
pattern imply differentiation?

please help.....

-
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 



		
____________________________________________________ 
On Yahoo!7 
Break a world record with Total Girl's World’s Largest Slumber Party 
http://www.totalgirl.com.au/slumberparty