[MD] confused

[gav]

cheers case,

looks like we need a new central concept.
maybe 'harmony' or mark's 'coherence' to describe
optimal states of being - this shifting balance of sq
and DQ.

'Quality is the Way'. that is spot on i think.

it only gets confusing when we move from mysticism to
metaphysics....as we were warned.

i don't think DQ = dynamic and static in balance is
best. i think that confuses things too much. instead:
harmony or coherence = dynamic and static in balance,
maybe?

cheers again mate
gav




--- Case <Case at iSpots.com> wrote:

> gav
> how does the Tao fit in? what is the Tao in MoQ
> terms.
> is it DQ? is it living in the present? is it a
> particular relationship between DQ and sq?
> 
> [Case]
> You have asked the question backwards. The question
> is: what is the MoQ in
> Taoist terms. In its present state it is confused...
> 
> The MoQ IS Taoism.
> 
> Quality is The Way and its two qualities are the
> dynamic and the static.
> What Pirsig calls DQ is the perception of harmony
> when the two are in
> balance. Nothing is purely static nor purely
> dynamic. But the world arises
> from their shifting balance.
> 
> Quality is undefined because balance shifts and
> sways over time. The Way
> meanders and even though we know what it is we can
> not say what it will be.
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 



		
____________________________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Upgrade to Internet Explorer 7, optimised for Yahoo!7
http://au.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44716/*http://au.downloads.yahoo.com/internetexplorer/index.php