[MD] confused
Heather Perella
spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 25 08:27:19 PDT 2006
> The mind is
> cryptic as you were unable to acuratley define it.
> Is'nt that what you people are about or am I missing
> it?
Being cryptic? It's not about trying to be
mysterious, if this is what your getting at. Ham
would want definitions layed out and everybody to
except this definition or that definition, and that's
all fine. The problem with this approach by Ham is
that culture's throughout the earth have applied
definitions, and yet he thinks he has the best
definition. Everybody might think that way one time
or another. If we had enough people to share and
agree with certain definitions, as Ham wants us to
with his, then we would have another culture. This is
not a new concept. People have been doing this for
ages. What's new is Ham thinks he has the best new
definitions and this new culture called Ham's culture
isn't satisfying enough. To get back to the original
point, being cryptic seems to be an element of
reality. This cryptic element is, I believe, due to
the aspects of reality that are not human. This
reality has an overall oneness, but yet, for me to
define what that overall oneness is, would be in vain.
I am a human being. The wind converses with me.
Yet, I am not the wind or a beaver, and so I respect
them. This conversation the world is amidst has
static patterns, and dynamic ones. It is all quality.
Even the mind is quality. So static and dynamic
quality play out everywhere. This might assume that
I'm prompting a MoQ culture, as opposed to a Ham
culture, but really I'm not pushing any specific
culture, due to the dynamism of reality, but that may
seem static.
SA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list