[MD] Intellect battles the barbarians

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Arlo Bensinger <ajb102 at psu.edu>:

> [Gene]
> You have yet to present a coherent defense for any of the ridiculous 
> arguments you have advanced, or Arlo's points. As far as I can tell, you've 
> got nothing but posturing and hot air, hardly the most intellectual basis...
> 
> [Platt]
> thanks for a classic example of a bald assertion without a scintilla of 
> evidence and thus intellectually vacant and ridiculous.
> 
> [Arlo]
> I'd say Gene's spot on. As they say, "the proof is in the pudding". Of 
> course, you could prove him wrong by actually providing a coherent defence 
> and drop the rhetorical posturing, here and in other threads... but given 
> yet another post that does nothing but this, I'd say the chances of that 
> happening are nil. Which was Gene's point. Which is why his assertion was 
> correct.

One does not need to defend an assertion which offers no proof and is best
characterized as an intellectually barren Rigel-like rant.





-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/