[MD] confused

[ARLO J BENSINGER JR]

[Arlo had said]
Arlo is "indifferent" to whether or not people choose to go nude in public,
meaning he is not offended by the human body.
 
He is not "indifferent" to the female body. Indeed, he finds it quite 
beautiful.

Just a point of clarification as you continue to dance the Limbaugh Limbo ....

[Platt]
Here's the relevant quote from Arlo:

[Arlo's quote]
"Platt attempts ridicule by suggesting I'd favor optional full nudity in public.
I'm indifferent to it."

[Arlo interjects]
You never tire of the Limbaugh Limbo, do you? Actually, its a perfect quote,
because unline your attempt to rhetorically turn it into something it is not,
it says exactly what I said above.

I am indifferent to public nudity. "Public nudity" is whether or not people go
nude in public. 

[Platt]
it's eminently reasonable to conclude that Arlo is indifferent to female bodies.

[Arlo]
Only in the delusion "spin" world of Platt. Wait, do I think I see coming what's
coming???....

[Platt]
Maybe Arlo really means he has absolutely no sexual interest in the female body.

[Arlo]
Daaaaaaamn, man. Even *I* didn't think you'd stoop to gay-baiting and homosexual
innuendos. I suppose desperate times call for desperate measures, eh?

[Platt]
Of course, if you believe words don't mean things . . .  

[Arlo]
Oddly, words do mean things. Which is why saying "I'm indifferent to full nudity
in public" is different than saying "I'm indifferent to the female body". Which
is why I could say "I'm indifferent to alcohol consumption in public", but
still love and appreciate a good ale.

But you just keep dancing the Limbaugh Limbo, its getting funny to watch.