[MD] confused

[ARLO J BENSINGER JR]

[Platt]
As Ham says, "As usual you're grasping at staws," in this case a desperate
attempt to compare drinking with being confronted with naked men and women.
That you don't "see"  :-) a difference merely confirms the absurdity of your
position.

[Arlo]
The only absurdity here, as usual, is your obsession with rhetorical
distorition.

"I am indifferent to public nudity." You can try to spin it to generate
homosexual innuendo, in a desperate attempt to distance yourself from your
inane comments in your original post, but it is what it is, distortive
rhetorical tactics.

Yes, let's shift the dialogue away from Platt's idiotic, indefensible remarks
that distort the MOQ, and try to make it about whether or not Arlo's comment
belies homosexuality. The latter is pathetic, but hey knock yourself out, it
doesn't bother me, it only makes me sorry to see someone have to stoop so low.
As for the former, anytime you're ready to defend your idiotic remarks, let me
know. Of course, given that's the sixth time I've said this, I doubt you'll do
little more than what your doing already.

As for "straws", of course you and Ham would phrase it like that. With logic
like you employ, no wonder you want no one to actually examine it. But, I'll
get to Ham's comments in another post.