[MD] So cometh MOQ, what next?

Heather Perella spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 27 15:33:55 PDT 2006


Platt,


> > Arlo's Question:
> > "Why is it "moral" for American men to forbid
> women from exposing their
> > breasts in public based on these same men finding
> breasts "sexually
> > provocative", but its not moral for Muslim to do
> the same with other body
> > parts?"

     [Platt] 
> I don't except the premise that Muslims find a
> woman's face "sexually 
> provocative." Arlo has provided no evidence to
> support such a claim. 
> Anyway, I don't see in the rules of MOQ discuss that
> one must answer every 
> question put to her or him. That would be silly. No
> one is on trial here. 


     We call that a stump, Platt.  Without
cooperation, it is then a debate, and in a debate your
on your own, and when in a debate if you don't address
the pertinent points, then it is assumed you have been
stumped.  You don't know how to answer Arlo's point. 
Now if you tried to cooperate with Arlo, and tried to
find out the answer to this questioning together,
well, then that would have been a different story.

SA


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the New Yahoo.com 
(http://www.yahoo.com/preview) 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list