[MD] confused

[Ron Kulp]

This is an excellent Idea, certainly would cut down on long heated
debates on definition where definition needs to be agreed apon to
further the concept...it can be frustrating to try to express a view
when one questions what you mean on every other
Word.
-Ron 
-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of pholden at davtv.com
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 7:57 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] confused

Quoting Ham Priday <hampday1 at verizon.net>:

[Platt]
> > Would be helpful I think
> > to have an "official" dictionary and an "official" encyclopedia for 
> > this site, one that is preferably accessible on the Internet without

> > a fee.

[Ham]> 
> Great idea.  Have you suggested it to Horse?  I just happen to have 
> the Webster's Collegiate that my son used in school.  The Dictionary 
> of Philosophy (really a compact encyclopedia of the subject) was 
> compiled by an editorial staff under Dagobert Runes, a prominent 
> philosophical researcher, and published by Littlefield, Adams & Co. in

> their New Students Outline
> (softback) Series.  You might want to check with a PhD like Ant or DMB

> as to the suitability of the Runes book for MoQ use as compared, say, 
> to Wikipedia.  (I'd prefer to recuse myself from such discussion for 
> obvious
> reasons.)

We'll see if anyone thinks this would be helpful to MOQ discussions. The
seed has been planted. 

Regards,
Platt


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing
list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/