[MD] Ham thinks the MOQ is a form of phenomenalism

[Heather Perella]

Mark,


     [Mark says to Ham]
> Yes, i do feel progress is being blocked.
> Take my statement above? You've not tackled it. We
> can't make progress if  
> you ignore my points.

     Mark, Ham has done that many times in the past. 
He has a habit of not focusing upon points being made.
 His essence thesis is narrow in scope and has a
difficult time shining light after awhile.  Usually he
ends up just saying so and so is being rhetorical, and
he won't bother answering questions or commenting upon
statements anymore.  His thesis is probably getting
frustrated trying to account for many happenings upon
this earth.  Yet, I can say that death ends up killing
everything.  So maybe everything, even Ham's thesis,
must end up just getting rid of everything, as Ham's
thesis seems to have rid society and evolution
already.  Maybe he's way ahead in the understanding of
this universe.  In a way, I'm being serious, no joke. 
Death ends up ridding societies, and what of evolution
in the face of death?  So maybe there's more to
everything than just this small inclusion called
evolution when one contemplates a Path that includes
Death.

I'm tryin',
SA    

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com