[MD] Ham thinks the MOQ Is a form of phenomenalism

[MarshaV]

Ian,

If I were to try to correct my statement, I would remove the word 
'box'.  I might rather state: If I am a constellation of patterns of 
static quality, can I ever know myself (constellation of patterns of 
static quality).  Like trying to look directly into my own eyes, the 
answer must be NO.  No for me.  No for Ham.  No for SA.  And no for 
you.  Do you think otherwise?

Marsha


Ian:
 >Ah yes Marsha, but it's a box with its own in-built means of escape to
 >ever higher quality. Dynamic quality and levels of evolution, rather
 >than a fixed set of traditions defined by the box.
 >Ian

Marsha:
I think the MOQ is a much better world view.  But I was thinking of
the fact that we can't ever really see ourselves.  Like not being
able to look directly into my own eyes.  Maybe I should have said we
are each a box, and a box is a box is a box.  I wasn't criticizing
SA.  SA set me a wondering, and wrote it.






moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/