[MD] Art of Value

MarshaV marshalz at charter.net
Mon Apr 2 01:54:21 PDT 2007



Greetings Dan,

Interesting...  I must be much more careful.  It seems I just 
bypassed that which I didn't agree with.  Very sloppy on my 
part.  But it did sound like Humphrey was writing of preintellectual 
experience.  And I think Brok's sentence, "I'm more comfortable with 
ambiguity these days.", was pretty smart.

Marsha




At 04:29 PM 4/1/2007, you wrote:
>Hello everyone
>
>Art doesn't have value. If it did, everyone would agree on it. They don't.
>Lila doesn't have Quality. Quality has Lila. Art doesn't have value. Value
>has art. When you see this then everything becomes art. Life and death are
>acts of art. Painting a painting is art but so is motorcycle maintenance and
>climbing mountains and sailing the seas and digging graves. Looking to the
>article we read:
>
>"Do u believe consciousness can survive the death of the brain?" he writes.
>No, Joe, it can't. Why kid ourselves? These were my answers, not
>Humphrey's."
>
>What a smug answer! Is Broks a dead man who is speaking to us from the
>grave? How could he possibly be so certain? He knows that trees cannot
>experience a sunny day. How? Is he a tree? The man is confronted by the
>great mystery of life and death and all he can offer is smugness and
>certainty. The guy needs to spill some tea from his cup, imo.
>
>Thank you for reading,
>
>Dan

   




More information about the moq_discuss mailing list