[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)

Case Case at iSpots.com
Thu Apr 12 12:05:52 PDT 2007


> [Ham]
> But a magnet isn't attracted to an iron bar because it is "aware of it", 
> nor does a ball thrown into the air fall because it "values" the ground.

[Craig]
That's a concise restatement of your position.  But you need to show the MoQ
explanation (that you've rejected) is incompatible with yours.

[Case]
For me the problem with applying terms like value and experience to the
inorganic is that rather than implying that this means that human morality
can be quantified, it is taken to mean that inorganic patterns can be
psychoanalyzed.





More information about the moq_discuss mailing list