[MD] Making money from surrender?

[ian glendinning]

As usual Platt, you are flip-flopping between two extreme views, and
missing reality. Reversing a decision to support does not equal a
decision to prohibit - except in deluded worlds of simplistic logic.

Prohibitting is not the point (that would be closing the stable door
anyway, even if it were the point), Not supporting / approving is the
point, whilst reviewing. I'd have to research the stories to find
precise details of where that has got to.

And again as usual you entirely dismiss the substance of the reply
about the moral question - and focus on a technical aside. Immoral.
Ian

On 4/10/07, pholden at davtv.com <pholden at davtv.com> wrote:
> Quoting ian glendinning <psybertron at gmail.com>:
>
> > Firstly Platt,
> >
> > Just an update on the facts ... this is old news ... the government
> > decision to support the selling was reversed within a day. But that
> > doesn't change the question of the morality of "selling" such stories.
>
> I must have missed the latest. Are you saying that the government has
> reversed its decision and that the sailors are now prohibited from selling
> their stories while in the service?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>