[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)

[craigerb at comcast.net]

[Ham] 
> If you can produce any evidence apart from observed "behavior" that supports 
> the concept of inorganic awareness, I will be most interested.


I hope you will not accept "any evidence apart from observed "behavior"".  Are you holding out for divine revelation?

[Craig, previously] 
> you need to show the MoQ explanation (that you've rejected) is incompatible with yours. 

[Ham] 
> I think my statement IS incompatible with the MoQ in this respect. What 
> more is there for me to "show"? It would seem that the burden of proof lies in your corner.

No, you got it backwards.  I've given an example (attraction of magnetic North & South poles) that your theory & the MoQ account for.  If you think the theories are incompatible, you must have in mind some test case that one will account for & the other not.
Craig