[MD] Contents of Moq_Discuss Digest, Vol 21, Issue 8

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting ARLO J BENSINGER JR <ajb102 at psu.edu>:

> [Platt]
> Ah yes, the critical thinker strikes again. It's OK to bash Bush but not OK to
> bash Clinton. Typical left-wing hypocrisy. And, lest we forget: 
> 
> [Arlo]
> Sorry, where exactly did I say that? Could you point out the post?

You agreed with Horse that Bush is an "idiot" and referred to a site to
"prove" it. 

> To clarify, because you found it necessary to once again contribute nothing but
> evil distortive rhetoric, I point out only the pathetic hypocrisy of those who
> cry like a baby when Bush is criticized, whine about how its just "Bush
> bashing", when they spent 8 years engaged in the most vile, despicable,
> horrendous "bashing" politics have ever seen.

Like I pointed out, it's OK for you to bash Bush, but not OK to bash forked-tongue
Clinton. Critical thinker strikes again with utter hypocrisy. 

> In other words, "you reap what you sow". How that simple point eluded you, I
> can only  imagine is a result of your desire to do nothing constructive in any
> dialogue.

Well, if you want to quote aphorisms, you are the epitome of the "pot calling
the kettle black." Yes, really constructive dialogue on your part. 

> As for the whole "Lewinsky" thing, how pathetic that that's your only retort to
> a clip demonstrating the absolute incompetent stupidity of Fearless Leader. "My
> guy's stupid and incompetent, but your guy had an affair". Oooooooo.... sex
> makes your skin crawl, doesn't it? 

There you go again. Bashing Bush as absolutely incompetent and stupid. And you 
have the gall to claim offering a constructive dialogue. How sick is that? 
Likewise your claim to critical thinking is so askew as not even to recognize the
blatant lies of your adulterous hero.

> By the way, for anyone listening (and no one should be), I recommend the
> eye-opening book by David Brock "Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an
> Ex-Conservative", who describes the right's perverse obsession with "Clinton"
> and "sex".
> 
> A synopsis is available at Wikipedia.
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blinded_by_the_Right
> 
> And much as I would love to spend my summer months engaged in another dialogue
> fending off your distorted rhetoric, I am bowing out. 

Yes, you better bow out when you can't distinguish between philandering and lying.



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/