[MD] current changes, current establishments

[Heather Perella]

    Hello all, I was thinking...


     Where the dynamic happens is between the levels. 
This is where the reexaminations/examinations occur. 
These are were the current questions are.  As Pirsig
points out, in Japan the MoQ wasn't anything new. 
Thus, in Japan, using this example, the MoQ would be
more stable and thus, more defined somewhere in the
middle of the levels I would say.  In the middle of
the levels (this is an analogy), for example, in the
middle of the social level, the social level would be
very stable and very easily defined by the current
understanding.  This middle of the social level is
where many social level events occur without much
social question.  It is so much of a given by the
social level or society in discussion, that it is seen
as socially natural.  
     Static patterns are still subject to change. 
Those static patterns that are CURRENTLY established
are 'nicely' and 'neatly' packaged upon the
appropriate level.  Those that are not so 'nicely' and
'neatly' packaged upon a level are in transition. 
Those moral questions, that Keith mentions in the
adjacent thread, that are to be dusted off and
reexamined are those static patterns that are
evolving, more dynamic, and susceptible to CURRENT
changes/forces.  At least this is what I'm
seeing/experiencing at the moment.


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469