[MD] Alternatives to the scientific method

[David M]

SA

Yes, but its propensities not laws, that's my point.

DM

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Heather Perella" <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Alternatives to the scientific method


>
>      [David M]
>> Apart from under controlled conditions there is
> always
>> vast uncertainty about actual outcomes,
>
>     Newtonian physics still works.  I'm not talking
> about "outcomes", predications, and what's the weather
> going to be in 6 months.  I'm talking about when
> objects are put into motion they stay in motion unless
> otherwise acted upon by other forces, etc...  Quantum
> conditions are quantum/micro.  Newtonian physics works
> on macro-scales.  Isn't this the current
> understanding?  I would say yes, by reading recent
> books by scientists.
>
>
>
>     [David M.]
>> on the particle level
>> these have a big impact becuase of the energy matter
>> ratios being higher. What is matter, other than
> bound up
>> energy?  Matter gives us the stability that is just
> enough
>> for life to emerge.
>
>     Exactly, matter, such as solids, liquids, and gas
> are organized enough that stability overrides the
> quantum uncertainity.  We can notice structure.  I'm
> not trying to predicate the future here.
>
> breezy,
> SA
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. 
> Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
> http://sims.yahoo.com/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>