[MD] subject / object logic

[MarshaV]

At 09:47 PM 8/14/2007, Dan wrote:

> >>
> >>[Marsha]
> >> I agree with Dan.  I think of it as all being Quality, there is the
> >> known (sq) and the unmanifest (DQ).  The known, or static quality, is
> >> relational and everchanging.  The MOQ is a more elegant, higher
> >> quality idea than SOM.
> >
> >[Ron]
> >Exactly, staticly percieved physical reality is Relational,which implies
> >value.
> >the relational value of subjects to objects, I do not see how the term
> >relation is comprehensable
> >in any other form. I agree, MOQ places focus on the value relationship
> >not the
> >subjects and objects themselves. SQ is this distinction, while DQ is the
> >incomprehensible
> >infinite (energy?). While all is DQ, SQ represents the s/o value
> >relation that is percieved.
>
>Dan:
>I would say static quality represents value. Perception is Dynamic.

Hi Dan,

This is interesting.  I think of direct perception as static/dynamic 
rather than pure dynamic.  While it is true that direct perception is 
experience without being filtered through thoughts (social & 
intellectual patterns), such experience is still filtered through 
biological patterns (sight, taste, hearing, etc.).  Isn't our system 
of sight a biological static pattern of value?

Marsha