[MD] Alternatives approaches to evolution
David M
davidint at blueyonder.co.uk
Wed Aug 15 13:10:11 PDT 2007
Hi Ian
Any thoughts on where all the variety comes from
that natural selection is able to pcim and mix from?
It sorts of suggests that this universe is just a selection
from an infinity that already exists.
David M
----- Original Message -----
From: <pholden at davtv.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Alternatives to the scientific method
> Quoting ian glendinning <psybertron at gmail.com>:
>
>> Jeez Platt, have you heard nothing of evolution since Darwin ? More
>> than a century of evidence ... he chose his language and metaphors for
>> his audience at the time.
>
> Oh no. Not the usual insult to begin a conversation. I was hoping . . .
>
>> Anyway, you are interpreting one sentence, which is open to other
>> interpretations than the purely linguistic allusions your analysis
>> suggests. Struggle yes, survival yes, in the face of "scarce
>> resources" of various kinds, but struggle can be overcome by reducing
>> barriers and dependencies, as well as brute force.
>
> Any specific examples of reducing barriers and dependencies that led to
> new
> species?
>
>> Your "sound-bite" simplification is misleading. These are "powerful"
>> processes yes, but they do not have to exert physical power - subtley,
>> guile, creativity, keeping a low-profile, quid-pro-quo, collaborative
>> / co-evolution / symbiosis, will do just as well .... to start making
>> any sense of examples, you need to separate the genomes (and memes)
>> from the host phenotypes - the "selfish" application of force
>> generally has little to do with the individuals of the species
>> exerting force. This was Dawkins point but like Darwin's "Survival of
>> the Fittest", his "Selfish Gene" sound-bite get's mis-used with
>> minimal understanding.
>
> Well, I open to further understanding. If you can give some concrete
> examples
> to illustrate your or Dawkin's generalities it would help.
>
> > Have you read Dennett's "Darwin's Dangerous Idea" (for example). If
>> you haven't it would be a good place to start - he's a good writer for
>> the lay reader (like me) and meticulously balanced in acknowledging
>> the alternative views of those who would disagree with him on many
>> points - like Gould, Lewontin and others ... Dawkins writing is too
>> sure of itself IMHO, and your rhetoric would chop his down at the
>> knees in five minutes. ;-) The levels of disagreement are however many
>> levels below these sound-bite headlines. The agreement is overwhelming
>> at most levels we are discussing here.
>>
>> Variety (eco-diversity) is the spice of life.
>
> Not sure what that has to do with the subject at hand. As for Dennett, is
> that
> the same Dennett who wrote "Consciousness Explained?" If so, I found him
> singularly
> unenlightening. Could you give me the gist of his view in "Darwin's
> Dangerous Idea?"
>
> Thanks,
> Platt
>
>
>
>>
>> On 8/13/07, pholden at davtv.com <pholden at davtv.com> wrote:
>> > Quoting ian glendinning <psybertron at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >
>> > > Platt, survival of the fittest has nothing to do with "ruthless
>> > > control". Fitness is about best quality of "fit" with environmental
>> > > opportunities, ruthlessly defeating your opponents (directly or in
>> > > control of resources) is only one aspect in only some cases. Fitness
>> > > is about fitting, not the power of being fit.
>> >
>> > >From Charles Darwin: "In the survival of favoured individuals and
>> > >races,
>> during
>> > the constantly-recurring struggle for existence, we see a powerful and
>> ever-acting
>> > form of selection."
>> >
>> > "Struggle" sounds like using "power" to me. "Struggle" also suggests
>> > action in
>> > an attempt to ruthlessly control a situation to assure a positive
>> > outcome, by
>> > whatever means available. Do you have evidence that evolution operates
>> otherwise?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> > Platt
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list