[MD] subject / object logic

[Ham Priday]

DMB says to Ham --


> So let me get this straight. Pirsig is a rationalizing, drunken,
> condescending, moralizer? Is that really what you think or
> are you just expressing frustration at your own inability to
> comprehend the MOQ? Given the overly emotional tone,
> the ridiculous straw man you portray and the lack of any
> coherent thoughts behind your insults, I'd bet big bucks on
> the latter.

I was simply using an analogy to express what passes for philosophy these 
days.  Since analogies are a form of poetic license freely used by your 
esteemed author, it seemed an appropriate way to summarize my take on 
Platt's analysis of the MoQ.  My statement was obviously intended as 
criticism of a thesis, not a personal  "insult".

If there is any "overly emotional tone" in this thread, your hysteric 
reaction is the first evidence of it.

--Ham