[MD] subject / object logic

[Ron Kulp]

DMB says to Ham --
> So let me get this straight. Pirsig is a rationalizing, drunken, 
> condescending, moralizer? Is that really what you think or are you 
> just expressing frustration at your own inability to comprehend the 
> MOQ? Given the overly emotional tone, the ridiculous straw man you 
> portray and the lack of any coherent thoughts behind your insults, I'd

> bet big bucks on the latter.
Ham:
I was simply using an analogy to express what passes for philosophy
these days.  Since analogies are a form of poetic license freely used by
your esteemed author, it seemed an appropriate way to summarize my take
on Platt's analysis of the MoQ.  My statement was obviously intended as
criticism of a thesis, not a personal  "insult".

Ron:
to this topic I offer this link on philosophy and poetry

http://www.nietzschecircle.com/essayArchive8.html