[MD] Cartman Lives?
Ant McWatt
antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk
Fri Aug 24 18:28:14 PDT 2007
DMB stated August 24th:
>Its strange how [Platt] parrots talk-radio and loves the law and order
>stuff, especially considering the way outcasts and contrarians play the
>hero in Pirsig's books. Pirsig is anything but an advocate of conformity.
>As Emerson said in THE AMERICAN SCHOLAR in 1837, "Imitation is suicide".
>(Guess what we're reading in my Pragmatism class.) He says, "the
>self-directed" must "defer never to the popular cry" and live in a "state
>of virtual hostility" to society. This struck me as very similar to the
>MOQ's portrait of the clash of social and intellectual values but he also
>seems to express the idea the Dynamic Quality is better than either of
>those. And that's what I wanted to add.
>
>Emerson's piece does far more than make a case for good, independent
>American scholarship. He looks more like a mystic to me and in the portrait
>he paints of the scholar he asks the intellectual to be a saint, an
>enlightened person, a genuine and authentic person, an artist and an
>original thinker. I was quite humbled and astonished by it. He says, "The
>one thing in the world, of value, is the active soul." The sort of creative
>genius, he says, "is the sound estate of every man, In its essence it is
>progressive. ...springing spontaneous from the mind's own sense of good and
>fair." (Need we ask anyone, Phaedrus?) "In the right state he is Man
>Thinking. In the degenerate state ...a mere thinker, or still worse, the
>parrot of other men's thinking..."
Ant McWatt asks:
You don't mean like regurgitating talk-radio show propaganda, by any chance?
(BTW, if I ever own a parrot, I will call him "Platt").
DMB continued August 24th:
>Books, he says, "are for nothing but to inspire". "Undoubtedly there is a
>right way of reading, so it be sternly subordinated. Man Thinking must not
>be subdued by his instruments." This is the sort of stuff that made him
>sound like a mystic and he touts Swedenborg (Named in Lila as a mystic) at
>the end of he piece, which would support the notion too.
>
>Following up on this hunch, I discovered this piece was written just before
>he started reading the Vedas and other Eastern texts. Maybe his later stuff
>reflects that and is even closer to the MOQ. We're reading Emerson as a
>sort of proto-Pragmatist. He looks like a pragmatist and he influenced
>William James especially. Henry James, the father of William, was also a
>Swedenborgian. I guess that had some influence on him too.
Ant McWatt comments:
This all sounds very good.
DMB continued August 24th:
>On Feb 29th, 1860 they all met at a secret meeting and agreed that slavery
>had to be abolished. They all agreed with the popular motto of the day, "we
>should fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here",
>even though it didn't make much sense on the eve of the civil war. They
>also agreed that we should support our troops by shopping as often as
>possible. Each of them named Jesus as their favorite philosopher. Why?
>Their belief in healing miracles allowed them to oppose socialized
>medicine. In fact, they often intentionally misquoted him as saying "let
>the children suffer" instead of "suffer the children". "No cash value",
>William would sometimes add. Then they'd laugh their pragmatic heads off.
>That's what Platt said he got from Wikipedia, anyway.
Platt then asked (in a type of ad hominine way) August 24th:
What is he talking about? Or, what is he smoking? Anyone?
Dr McCommielover replies:
I don't know but I sure would like some!
.
_________________________________________________________________
Get Pimped! FREE emoticon packs from Windows Live -
http://www.pimpmylive.co.uk
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list