[MD] subject / object logic

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

>From: "Ron Kulp" <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
>Subject: Re: [MD] subject / object logic
>Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:01:51 -0400
>
>
>
>[Ron]
>I don't want to come up with another philosophy, but if I feel
>that MOQ has some holes in it I'm going to point them out.
>I realize this is way out there, and risk being branded some
>kind of heretic but I think I have a point.
>Not like what I think means a damn in hell to anyone anyway.
>Thanks for indulging my curiosity....
>you ought to at least check out what Dan had to say about the whole
>thing
>http://members.tripod.com/~Glove_r/SOLAQI.htm
>very interesting...I wonder what made him change his tune about it. He
>never explained that.

Hi Ron
I put together the website you refer to years ago, way back in 1998 or 
thereabouts. I find that my thinking has evolved over the years as I gain 
more experience with the MOQ. I like to think that I am flexible in that 
regard. I feel that I gained a great deal of insight during the work on 
LILA'S CHILD as well as reading the discussions here plus I have learned a 
great deal from Ant McWatt's work.

Still, when I put together the page you mention I was not endorsing Bodvar's 
SOL idea so much as I was attempting to gain an understanding of where he 
was coming from. So I really have't changed my tune though I can see why 
someone might get that impression. I feel philosophically a person should be 
able to explain someone else's position even though they themselves might 
not hold that position.

I might give some people here the impression that I am pissed or miffed from 
time to time. I assure you I am not. There is little use in going on 
explaining what I see as the MOQ postition when someone has a full cup of 
tea to begin with, so to speak. It is impossible to pour anything more into 
that cup when it is already full of preconceived ideas.

I am not as smart as most people here. It takes a lot of time for me to 
understand what they're saying and even then I get most of it wrong. All in 
all I find that I just do not have the time to spend here like I used to. I 
don't know if that's good or bad. I guess it just is.

Anyway, thank you for your interest and best wishes,

Dan