[MD] Does Quality really exist?

[skutvik at online.no]

Hi Matt (Kundert)

On 3 Dec. you said:
 
> You said that I "no longer speak to" you anymore in your last post
> directed to me.  I feel a little bad about that, but there's nothing
> really I can do about it.  In my estimation, I spilled enough time and
> energy at trying to engage you in dialogue to justify being able to
> say this:

This is the weirdest argument I've ever heard, I have found the 
MOQ to be a great tool and if your "dance" means for me to 
compromise that, no way. I am however not the Jehovah's 
Witness kind who thump the Bible, rather I've found Pirsig books 
not always  conveying the MOQ and have tried to point to the 
Quality parts as well as the faulty ones. I thought the purpose of 
all thinkers were to find the "Philosophers Stone" and IMO Pirsig 
has - with the a little modification- and this makes the MOQ 
invulnerable so no wonder I sound ironclad. Look to my last post 
to your , it wasn't exactly the most fundamental issue, but I 
showed that Phaedrus of ZAMM considered the "analytic knife" to 
be SOM, not you version, but instead of commenting THAT you 
start on this. Well, no sore feelings, please continue your "dance" 
with DMB, that may be the ideal scholastic "number of angels on 
pinheads" dispute.

Bo