[MD] The Top Down Fallacy

[ian glendinning]

Absolutely SA ... my reference to Paul Turner was the same reference ,
Paul was bringing his analysis of Buddhist texts to this, looking at
different "flavours" of Buddhism and different western translations /
interpretations of these.

I was simply attributing Paul bringing it to the MoQ-Dicuss debate previously.
(It's a pity Paul has "gone dormant".)
Ian

On 12/5/07, Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com> wrote:
>     [Ian says to Krimel in which Ian agrees with
> gav's usage of Paul Turner's tetralemma approach]
>
> Causation is in fact a pretty limited metaphor here -
> I prefer Paul (Turrner)'s "dependent arising".
>
>
>     "dependent arising" is also found in buddhism
> called 'dependent origination'.
>
>
> SA
>
>
>      ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>