[MD] Is/is not

[David M]

Ham:To the extent that Pirsig seems to define existence as the product of
> experience, change is illusory.  On the other hand, to the extent that he
> insists on dealing with existence as evolutionary process, change is
> essential.  What neither Parmenides nor Pirsig has taken into account is
> that existence is only what "appears to be" in time and space, whereas
> ultimate reality is the undifferentiated source of experience.  Since the
> mode of experiential reality is relative to time and space, it cannot be
> Absolute Realty.  Once we understand this--Voila!--there is no paradox.
>


DM: I think we can suggest that experience is absolute and is both 
undiffereniable
and equally differentiable. And volia we do not need to imagine a reality 
without experience
because that would be a very odd thing to imagine don't you think!