[MD] Does Quality exist?

[Matt Kundert]

Hey SA,

Did you think I said those things below?  That wasn't me (which would be weird and hard to put together with the many other things I've said in the past), that was Redsky235.

Matt

> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:09:55 -0800
> From: spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] Does Quality exist?
> 
> 
>     [Matt]
> But if there is indeed an absolute Quality, then a
> well educated (or  
> experienced) critic would have more knowledge when
> approaching a text and, theoretically, should be able
> to discern its elements that ultimately reveal 
> Quality.
> 
> 
> 
>      Why does this critic have to be "well educated"
> and "have more knowledge when approachinig a text"?
> 
> 
> 
>      [Matt]
>   If there is an absolute Quality, and an absolute way
> to reveal  that Quality, then there is a definitive
> way of constructing and reading a text.
> 
> 
> 
>      Dynamic quality isn't definitive.
> 
> 
> 
> woods,
> SA 
> 
> 
>       ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

_________________________________________________________________
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com/connect.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_newways_112007