[MD] Knowledge as MOQ's intellect

[MarshaV]

Dan,

What do you think of making the Intellectual Level subject/object 
only, and creating a MOQ level above?

Marsha




At 02:23 PM 12/16/2007, you wrote:

>Hello everyone
> > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:08:48 -0500> To: 
> moq_discuss at moqtalk.org> From: marshalz at charter.net> Subject: Re: 
> [MD] Knowledge as MOQ's intellect> > Marsha:> > > You have a 
> website. Could you represent your view of the levels as a> > > 
> drawing?> >Bo:> >Yes, but I got help in constructing it and it just 
> contains my "Quality> >Event" essay from 1996 that has the usual 
> block diagram which is the> >very source of all misunderstandings. 
> By now the site is outdated> >(shame on me) I once had a drawing 
> from Pirsig of the MOQ as> >concentric rings, the paper itself 
> represented DQ, but he added that it> >stretched outside the paper 
> to the end of the world. This may sound> >impressive but is the 
> impossible Quality outside the MOQ. When we> >draw diagrams the 
> paper is all and when we use language IT is all.> Marsha:> I'd like 
> to see a diagram. Maybe you could send it to me offlist, or > have 
> Horse post it on the MOQ website. Whether diagram or language, > I 
> find trying to confine what is
>   outside of levels problematic. But > I would like to see what 
> sort of diagram you would invent.>
>
>Hi Marsha & Bo
>I think you might be referring to my old MOQ model:
>
>http://members.tripod.com/~Glove_r/awimple.html
>
>There was a time when I thought I was really on to something. Then I 
>realized it was just poo on my shoe.
>
>Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/