[MD] Knowledge as MOQ's intellect

[ian glendinning]

Bo, Gav, Peter and Marsha, to name a few ...

Bo, Gav, I think Peter states this better. I cannot equate SOM to
Intellect. I could use the idea of "based on" in a historical /
evolutionary sense, but not in any fundamental "underlies" sense.

I call if "GOF Intellect" as you know. A place where intellect started
a journey, to use Peter's language, but where its leading edge is
clearly much more enlightened.

Bo, you display the same blind spot, when you accuse some of us in
applying a SOMist dualism to a Quality / MOQ split. We use the
language of our SOMist culture to debate the issue, but our thinking
really has moved on.

(Bo you make a good point about the intellect / intelligence confusion
... but I don't think it's relevant to the point here.)

Ian

On 12/17/07, skutvik at online.no <skutvik at online.no> wrote:
> Hi Gav
>
> 17 Dec. you  wrote: (in you no-caps style)
>
> > i think that the subject-object split underlies the intellectual level.
>
> That's it! But why not say that is IS the intellectual level? Is there
> a difference?
>