[MD] Knowledge as MOQ's intellect

[MarshaV]

At 04:48 PM 12/17/2007, you wrote:

>I'm pressed for time at the moment  but quickly,
>The captain projected his cultural preconceptions on Lila, when he was
>Questioning her she got upset with him and told him she was what he
>perceived her to be, not who she really is, she says that is what most
>men she has met do to her.

Greetings Ron,

I understood Lila's soliloquy a little differently.  I think of her 
as stating that to name/define something is to kill it.  To make it 
static and kill off the dynamic aspects.  And in this sense, it is 
exactly why I do not like Bo's idea of creating a MOQ level.  To 
confine Quality, or DQ, to a level may make it static.  It's also the 
reason I don't like Ham's use of the words 'primary' and 
'purpose'.  To my thinking Quality (DQ) is best left is indivisible, 
undefinable and unknowable, and for Bo's case, unconfined.

Marsha