[MD] What is SOM?
David M
davidint at blueyonder.co.uk
Tue Dec 18 13:31:24 PST 2007
Hi Peter
Indeed, and human subjects are 'subjected' to divine commands
they must obey, until they start to ask whether creative and
commanding powers can be stolen from the gods.
David M
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Corteen" <psigenics at googlemail.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] What is SOM?
> How about God and the World as the very first subject and object.
>
> -Peter
>
> On 17/12/2007, skutvik at online.no <skutvik at online.no> wrote:
>>
>> Steve and Group
>>
>> 16 Dec. you wrote:
>>
>> > What I'm seeing in the exchange quoted below is a lot of difference
>> > in view of what SOM is. I've started a new thread here to see what if
>> > we can clarify.
>>
>> > I think if SOM mostly in terms of subjective/objective knowledge
>> > distinctions while you see it as symbol/what is symbolized.
>>
>> I repeat that "symbol/what's symbolized" is just one of SOM'
>> many facets.
>>
>> > Can others provide evidence of what Pirsig means by subject-object
>> > metaphysics?
>>
>> We all hopefully agree that ZAMM's "Greek section" describes
>> the emergence, development and coming of age of SOM.
>> (my caps)
>>
>> Anaxagoras and Parmenides had a listener named
>> Socrates who carried their ideas into full fruition. What is
>> essential to understand at this point is that until now there
>> was no such thing as MIND and MATTER, SUBJECT and
>> OBJECT, FORM and SUBSTANCE. Those divisions are
>> just dialectical inventions that came later.
>>
>> There are surely more S/O derivatives, Mind/body, mental/
>> corporeal, abstract/concrete and the said symbol/what's
>> symbolized are obvious. One more subtle is nurture/nature but as
>> we know, these two never agrees on who determines mankind, so
>> it's typical S/O. "Soul" was Greece's contribution to Judaism that
>> constituted Christianity so soul/body is another dichotomy. SOM
>> has had an enormous influence on Western philosophy by
>> creating the problem (all western thinking are footnotes to Plato
>> they say) and has coloured all "solutions". Pirsig is the first to
>> have put the bell on the cat and could have been the next Plato,
>> but regrettably did not complete the task that Phaedrus started.
>>
>>
>> IMO
>>
>> Bo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list