[MD] Teachings from the American Earth (Part I)
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Mon Feb 5 11:30:16 PST 2007
[Bo]
It sounds as if you regard the multi-strata
intellect as wrong, I wish you were right, but
I'm afraid it's dogma: Aretê (and the Native
American version of it) the original good
intellect, then SOM as a faulty strata and
finally MOQ as the correct intellectual strata.
[Arlo]
I don't regard a multi-strata intellect as wrong.
I've said many times I regard the levels as broad
strokes, with finer and finer gradations (in
complexity and kind) all the way down. As such
I've come to regard the MOQ as "fractal". Viewed
from a certain distance, the four levels make a
distinct pattern, but as one zooms in, one sees a
recursion of pattern that, among other things,
makes demarcation (or absolute boundries) impossible.
But here you say something that runs counter to
what I thought you had been saying. Namely, that
Arete was "good intellect". I had thought you
placed Arete firmly as social Quality. If you are
saying that Arete was a pre-S/O intellectual
pattern that was usurped/replaced by S/O
intellect, we may be close in agreement. Given
this, as you suggest, the pre-Socratic Greeks and
the Amerindians had a "good intellect". The Greek
tradition was hijacked by S/O metaphysics (as per
ZMM), while the Amerindian intellect was never given dominance over society.
As for the "politically correct" bruhaha, it runs
both ways, but it only ever bothers most people
when its "those others" doing it. One's own PC,
or one's own party's PC, is typically either
silently accepted or actively promoted while the other's is condemned.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list