[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)

Micah micah at roarkplumbing.com
Fri Feb 9 05:36:24 PST 2007


Platt,

Yes.

Micah


-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org]On Behalf Of pholden at davtv.com
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 6:59 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)


Quoting Micah <micah at roarkplumbing.com>:

> Ron,
>
> I see where you, Case, and Platt misinterpret me. "Objective reality"
> doesn't mean reality is primary. Objective has a different meaning than
> primary. Not only do they have different meanings, they're spelled
> different. Now there is no "objective" way to show reality is primary, we
> would need to be present to prove it is primary, which is a contradiction.

With three of us "misinterpreting" you, do you suppose it might be because
you haven't expressed yourself clearly? Seems to me the burden of proof to
be understood is in your court.


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list