[MD] dualism
Heather Perella
spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 11 05:33:36 PST 2007
> > [SA previously]
> > Could we call the MoQ, dualism?
[Kevin]
> I think a better question is do people who advocate
> the Metaphysics of Quality
> do so to encourage separateness or oneness.
Excellent question. I wonder the same with some
posters in this forum. I, for one, encourage oneness.
> > [SA previously]
> > How does a fallacy exist? Or, maybe, are you
> saying that dualism and oneness can co-exist? Not
sure.
[Kevin]
> I'm saying separateness is an illusion and dualism
> is its supporting philosophy.
Yes, I understand and agree. Due to sickness
that separateness encourages I side with oneness as
better. How fallacies and deceit, such as separation
philosophies, i.e. dualism, go on is due to thinking
this is the only way and accepting ones disposition is
so due to birth or a G-d. To not think their is
another way, such as living philosophy of oneness, is
to keep heaven up in the sky somewhere far, far, away.
> > [SA previously]
> > > > deer just ran by,
> >
> > [Kevin]
> > > Be one with the deer.
[SA previously talks of finding dead deer]
[Kevin]
> You took that literally?
What literally? I saw this deer run by, then
found out it was dying in the neighbors yard, then I
tried to comfort the deer the only way I knew how with
petting it as I hummed. Not sure what literal means?
This experience was real, but I'm sure could have been
done another way, and as I look back upon this
experience I may still gather new insights, experience
those last breaths of the deer, and this shows how the
past is still with us carving the present.
thanks.
tracks in the morning snow,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list