[MD] Clouds

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Case <Case at iSpots.com>:

> [Case]
> And the consumer should pay the full cost of the product. Requiring the
> producer to pay for the cost of production influences the charge for the
> goods and service. Allowing the producer to dump crud in the air and water
> may cheapen the price of the goods but it passes the true cost of production
> on to whoever has to deal with foul air and water.
> 
> At the point where air and water are foul we have a public problem and
> require a public solution hence the need for government. Some of us bed
> wetters think government should require a solution at the source before it
> even becomes a public problem.

The issue is what constitutes "foul." I consider Arlo's motorcycle to emit
foul noises and think the government out to require at solution at the source
(a muffler) not only under the principle you cite, but under the principle
of equality before the law. (Cars are required to have mufflers.) Further,
jet airplanes foul the air the noise AND oil residues, so I gather you would
favor grounding the airlines.  

> Now, are you an anarchist or what?

No. I'm a right wing, racist, misogynist, xenophobic, homophobic, greedy,
warmongering capitalistic theocratic pig.       


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/