[MD] Global Warming: Science or Politics?
Dan Glover
daneglover at hotmail.com
Tue Feb 13 13:24:02 PST 2007
>From: pholden at davtv.com
>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>Subject: Re: [MD] Global Warming: Science or Politics?
>Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:22:22 -0500
>
>Quoting Dan Glover <daneglover at hotmail.com>:
>
>Well, I'm honestly surprised such a wise person as you would resort to an
>ad hominem attack.
Hi Platt
Well I was speaking of the characters in the book, not the author. Sorry if
I wasn't clear. It seemed a good read but I really didn't take the premise
seriously. I thought it was a work of fiction. That's what the cover said.
>Have you read Crichton's book about global warming.
Yes I have. I've read The DeVinci Code too but I tend to doubt Jesus Christ
left a lineage of geniuses here on earth. But who knows?
>Have you
>examined the scientific data charts therein?
I don't know if "examine" is the right word. I looked at them. Not being a
climate scientist I'm not sure I have the ability to interpret them
properly. I assumed they were all part of the social level story behind the
book. I could be wrong.
>
> > Let's just forget about the whole thing and stick our heads back in the
> > sand. After all, neither of us will be around in a hundred years so why
> > worry about it.
>
>You said before that we're all doomed either way. So why get all riled up?
Right. I'll shut up now.
Thank you,
Dan
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list