[MD] Global Warming: Science or Politics?

[ian glendinning]

Matt (Poot), Case, etc

.... which is eactly why I mentioned totalitarianism earlier in this
very thread.

Organised authority needs to be an intellectual elite, whose
constitution must safeguard against the risks of social degeneracy
(and preserves all the necessary freedoms of choice and
communication.)

The whole of such a society can then be treated as "peers".

Anything less is a compromise, to truth and quality.

Ian

On 2/14/07, Matt poot <mattpoot at hotmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
>
> >[Case]
> >While lying with statistics may work for politicians it is less effective
> >in
> >the sciences where most of the practitioners are familiar with Huff and
> >Mark
> >Twain. That is what peer review is designed to eliminate.
> >
>
>
> But what if the vast majority of those peers are involved in a highly
> complex and powerful organization with the secret desire to install
> totalitarian governments through the improvement of public health and living
> standards.
>
> WHAT THEN CASE!!!!????
>
>
> zpoot
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live Spaces: share your New Year pictures!
> http://discoverspaces.live.com/?loc=en-CA
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>