[MD] The Bridge Over Paradox

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Kevin Perez <kjp_on_moq at yahoo.com>:

> You appear to be subordinating the "seeing process" to the MOQ.  This kills it,
> imo.
> Better to say the MOQ points to the "seeing process," again, imo.
>  
> > The more I think about it, the more I become convinced that the MOQ 
> > provides a bridge over paradoxes, recursions, self-contradictions and 
> > loops because it rises above and looks down at  intellectual level. But, I 
> > could be wrong.
>  
> I can understand how one would see it this way if one sees the MOQ as something
> that embodies the "seeing process."  Backwards, imo.

Hi Kevin,

You may be right, but I can't separate the MOQ from it's heart and soul, namely
direct experience/valuation, i.e., Penrose's "seeing" metaphor. Otherwise, the MOQ
is just another SOM metaphysics, pointing from itself (subjective) to otherness
(objective). 

Platt



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/