[MD] The Bridge Over Paradox

[Heather Perella]

      [Platt]
> Yes, good of you to point it out. When I say "I
> think " I am using the verbiage of
> SOM which, as has been noted by Hofstader and
> others, inevitably leads to recursive
> loops --- as your questions so vividly illustrate! 
> It is my habit, and perhaps that of others, to say
> "I think" when actually I was
> reporting a Dynamic understanding as in the MOQ, not
> a logical conclusion as in SOM.


     "understanding" and "reporting" as in "reporting
a Dynamic understanding" that's what the mind does,
right?  The mind understands and reports.  Still stuck
in SOM you and Bo may say.  I wonder how you and Bo
view the world with a S/O intellect, oh, probably with
a S/O view.

thanks, but not getting this 'out of this intellect'
thinking, yet, still 'out of the mind' but 'part of
the mind' yet, not the mind, etc, etc.

    I would suggest just have MoQ intellectual
thoughts in the mind, and with more practice the S/O
intellect will not be the habit of how you perceive
the world (perceive is of the mind; the intellect). 
Either I've changed the view of these levels to
incorporate a static quality view, or you and Bo are
not changing these levels into static quality levels
and want to hold onto SOM, or maybe something else is
going on.  I've leave that latter as a true
possibility.

     Mountains are mountains, and rivers are rivers
     Mountains are not mountains and rivers are not
rivers
     Mountains are really mountains and rivers are
really rivers
                               
thanks.

evening,
SA  


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com