[MD] the MOQ and its environment

[skutvik at online.no]

Hi Heather

On 23 Feb. you wrote:

> [Bo]
> > Why some regards the intellectual level being
> subordinate to the DQ/> SQ reality (SOM subordinate to
> the MOQ) such a "lese-majesty" I 
> > don't understand. Maybe Kevin will enlighten me.
 
> Bo, a SOM philosopher in disguise.  Reason the world
> into subjects and objects and divide it all up, rid
> MoQ, that's his apparent motto.
 
> Or, he can gain enlightenment from these quotes.
> 
> Lila; Ch. 9:
> "It certainly felt right. Not subject and object but
> static and Dynamic is the basic division of reality."

It's beyond me why you see me violating the Dynamic/Static 
tenet. I who want the MOQ to contain its static levels, including 
intellect, NOT intellect containing the MOQ, which is the most 
blatant violation of the said tenet and of logic in general.. 

> Lila; Ch. 13  
> "Third, there were moral codes that established the
> supremacy of the intellectual order over the social
> order - democracy, trial by jury, freedom of speech,
> freedom of the press. Finally there's a fourth Dynamic
> morality which isn't a code." 

Yes, total agreement, beyond the topmost static quality level is 
Dynamic Quality. Together this makes up the Quality Reality or 
MOQ. Disgreement only when someone wants the MOQ to be an 
intellectual pattern.

IMO

Bo