[MD] the MOQ and its environment

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>:

> I don't see quality as being outside of
> intellect, thus, symbolism and definition.

Then you disagree with Pirsig who says Quality comes before intellectual
abstractions and cannot be defined. 

> It is an
> intellect intellectualizing quality, not just stuck on
> intellectualizing S/O.  Intellect intellectualizing
> quality are these pointers and 'out of the blue'
> insights.  Intellect only viewing S/O will only view
> subjects dividing objects, etc... etc...  These are
> two types of intellect.  The MOQ joins these two types
> of intellect by shifting the S and O from dividing and
> that being the last, or end perception - a divided
> world.  The MOQ shifts this dividing
> perception/intellect of SOM and does not get stuck in
> the strange looping of divide, upon divide, upon
> divide... back upon itself, never getting beyond its'
> divide.  The MoQ is able to shift these paradox that
> points out S/O is not the end, the ultimate reality. 
> The MoQ points out how quality=reality, and S/O is a
> koan shattering, and shocking the mind into a
> different reality when the reality perceived is a
> quality reality, and thus, S/O is not the ultimate
> perception, for when this koan was shatters the mind a
> new perceived world is glimmered (dharmakaya light),
> and another perception/intellect is able to take
> hole/static latch and patterns of intellect evolve
> that are static intellectual quality, not SOM.

Two types of intellect? Disagree. Pirsig describes intellect (mind) as
the creation and manipulation of symbols. Intellect writes the notes,
Quality is the music. Big difference.

  

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/