[MD] the MOQ and its environment

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>:


>      If your goal is to directly experience dq, then
> so be it.

Hardly a goal to be achieved because I can't help but experience it
even if I wanted to. DQ is direct experience.

> Intellect is quality, too, though. 
> Intellect is static quality.  Division in the MOQ
> doesn't separate intellect from quality.  Sure
> intellect and direct experience are not the same, but
> intellect is quality, though static.  Since you seem
> to want to just directly experience reality, I would
> recommend not ridding intellect as quality, and
> thinking intellect is not part of reality.  Intellect
> is part of reality.

I don't WANT "to just directly experience reality." I CANNOT HELP BUT
directly experience reality because there's no difference between
experience and reality.

>     A rock is not paradoxical when a rock is distinct
> and still left untouched as 'rock is dq'.

A rock is not dq. Rocks don't experience. Rocks are senseless aggregates
or heaps, like a pile of dirt.

> I don't use S/O to define intellect and
> thus, discuss intellect.  A tree is brown.  Show me an
> S and O in this intellectual statement. 

The subject (S) in the objective statement (O) "A tree is brown" is the person
making the assertion. 



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/