[MD] Dawkins a Materialist

[ian glendinning]

I appreciated that Platt ... but you quoted it ...

The public levels of expectation for what passes for "science", which
you and all the wider media subscribe to, is the issue at point. You
have to look beyond the published words, and cultural conditioned
presumptions in their meaning.

I'm not criticising anyone, just pointing out a problem "we" have.

Ian

On 1/2/07, pholden at davtv.com <pholden at davtv.com> wrote:
> Quoting ian glendinning <psybertron at gmail.com>:
>
>
> > Platt, you said
> > "Are the rules elusive just because we can't solve the equations or
> > because something fundamentally new happens when we increase numbers
> > and levels of complexity? Opinions vary ..."
>
> That is a quote from the article, not something I said.
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>