[MD] SOLAQI, Kant's TITs, chaos, and the S/I distinction

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

>From: MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>Subject: Re: [MD] SOLAQI, Kant's TITs, chaos, and the S/I distinction
>Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:25:11 -0500
>
>
>
>Greetings many,
>
>Without the effort of the climb, or the hardship of the journey, you
>seem to resent not having the perspective of the Sage.

Hi Marsha

Yeah, I kind of hinted at that when I asked Case when his next book was due 
to be published. He took it as a joke.

I wasn't joking.

Armchair quarterbacking seems a prime occupation for many contributors here. 
I guess it just boils down to respect, or lack of.

>
>You want to rearrange the levels for who???

Exactly. The beauty of the MOQ lies in its simplicity yet many readers of 
LILA want to introduce more or less levels or even rearrange the levels and 
then they go on to define Dynamic Quality. And they wonder why they get 
accused of not reading the book in the first place, so they do a copy and 
paste job to impress everyone. I'm sorry but I am not impressed... at all.

Thanks for your comments,

Dan