[MD] Dawkins a Materialist

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting ian glendinning <psybertron at gmail.com>:

> I simpy repeat Platt,
> 
> That limit is always contingent and evolving.
> MoQ makes the cut, stands the tests of science, and contributes to its
> evolution. Astrology falls at the first hurdle, so is soon discarded.
> Simple really.
> 
> Science "has not adequately explained .... " is just a matter of
> individual and cultural opinion. It will change, in the same way as
> science evolves.

When science changes its assumptions do let me know. Until then, it is
indeed hidebound and limited by its own standards, such as its "tests"
including peer review. Thank goodness Van Gogh wasn't confined by the
scientific worldview. 
 


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/